At komoot, we have lately been busy moving to a more microservice-oriented architecture. Many of our new features, such as the card feed that shows up whenever our mobile apps are opened, have been implemented in this fashion. We have also refactored and re-implemented some existing core components as dedicated services, one example being our routing engine.
The fact that you have to juggle two wildly different environments to do full-stack development can be a pain point. For features that require only simple UI elements React.js is also perhaps overkill — a few server-rendered pages or an iframe with a bit of jQuery can often be enough. I think having the ability to package the UI and the backend logic together as a truly stand-alone service is an attractive concept. This works especially well if the web-facing feature we want to implement is already conceptually separate from the rest of the web UI. Examples would be an import dialog, a feedback form, a payment processor and so on.
In Java land, I have long been a fan of containerless web services à la Dropwizard. After playing around with Spring Boot for a while, I would say that it does an at least equally fine job. For a development team that's already used to Spring, there's also less of a learning curve and more familiar libraries that you can just pick up and start using, Spring Security being a good example.
A while ago I developed a toy payment service while checking out Duct, a recent addition to the Clojure web application development ecosystem. That application also morphed into a kind of "vertical microservice" as described above. I really enjoyed the seamless integration of Clojure and ClojureScript when developing that application, so I decided to see what it would be like to develop roughly the same application using Java and Spring Boot.
When developing the Clojure-based payment application, I made good use of core.async for orchestration between different parts of the backend, such as the reporting subsystem and the payment processing component — the separation of behavior and data and event-based approach that core.async brings is a big win in my opinion. When looking for something similar for use in a Java project, I finally landed by RxJava. The concept is not quite the same as core.async, but it does support a more functional, event-driven style of programming. It's also pretty easy to port some core.async goodies, such as implementing timeouts by waiting for the first of several Observables to emit a value (the core.async equivalent would be to wait for the first of several channels to close, where one channel is a timeout channel).
Some people may say that RxJava is best (or only) suited for UI programming, but I do think it has its place in the backend too. See this post on the Netflix blog for a good example. The library does however come with a lot more concepts than a simple little thing like core.async, and I'm still only learning the basics.
Implement a separate, node.js-based build chain with for example Grunt for things like SASS compilation, JS minification and so forth. Then just serve the content as static files in your application and have Maven run an external task during the production build. This will be the favorite for most people with JS experience, I think.
Bend your existing Java build system to manage the frontend parts as well. Great for Java devs who don't want to learn about node.js! But good luck trying to get a web designer to install Maven if you need help with those stylesheets ...
Since I am developing this project on my own and use Maven for Java development, I decided to go with the latter option. In order to not complicate things too much, I opted for a pretty basic but decently scalable setup:
I would still like to implement cache busting for the frontend assets.
The hardest part of the entire project was easily getting everything frontend-related to behave as expected, both when running from the IDE and using a production JAR! I would not recommend going with the Maven-based approach for anything really complex. Still, I am pretty satisfied with the result and I hope the project can serve as an example of how to wire things up for a simple application.
There are many avenues I didn't explore when creating this application — for the frontend parts, I could for example have relied on an asset pipeline like wro4j or used a node.js build chain. I wanted to see how far you could get with simple building blocks such as small, focused Maven plugins, and it turns out it is definitely doable.
Java 8, Spring Boot and RxJava show that there is still some fun to be had in Java land — at least as far as the backend goes. But if you decide to go down the path of vertical microservices on the JVM, I think Clojure and ClojureScript is an unbeatable combination at the moment.